I'm smart..I'm FredoBaca!!! I can do things...like report the self hacking of my own password and POST THE SAME EXACT BLOG TWICE ON PAGE ONE.
FredoBaca you win the MB FREDO Award!!! Gold Medal for you FredoBaca.
You are smart and you can do things. You keep showing us your Fredo qualities with your every post:)
Fredo, Glad you enjoyed these quotes from your boy Willard and guess what? He adds to them almost daily and now with Ryan, he just doubled down. It's like having two Sarah Palins. :-)
psssssst....pssssst. FredoBaca you have posted this exact same blog twice on the first page. psssssst Fredo, I know you are smart and you can do things but a duplicate blog post is not neccessary and it makes you appear so FredoBaca-ish. pssssst. come on Fredo take one blog down so the nice readers don't start to think that you are a little too simple for their taste.
pssst....
FredoBaca listen to me. I am trying to spare you from further self embarrassment.
Larry are you actually trying to win the MB Fredo award? You have me a little worried Larry.
As far as running for President since these above are not really dealing with issues
HOW about a few quotes from Obama about how he is going to cut back on government waste????
I guess the staus quo is satisfactory for the left ... Burn that monwey baby burn it... we can always increase taxes...
Fredo, yeah, I know the blog posted twice. I was trying to fine those pesky words not allowed, you know those n----l and r...g. Somehow it posted twice but the second one has the corrections.
Oh, you already won the lifetime MB Fredo award so worry not...
Native, Fredo asked for equal time as well, why don't you guys get together and post one of your own.
You can start out with the quote today about Willard refusing to show us his tax records...
Well time to go watch some football I missed the last couple of days....
I will be adding another one to mine tomorrow, so tune in tomorrow when Willard will say something Palin-ish once again and humor us all...
Now you two guys work on your own quotes piece. I already gave you a lead...
Added number #33....\
Hey Native and Fredo, where is your submission?
The score is now 33 to zero...:-)
Hey Larry,
Here is a YouTube video chronicling the history of "multiple choice" Mitt Romney. Watch how in one interview he says one thing and then the exact opposite in another.
Youtube.... the same lying site that totally misrepresent the death of the wife of a man supposedly killed by Romney???
No control over content...
Romney killed a man's wife?!?!? And he is still allowed to run for office of the President of the United States?
Oh, wait, isn't this the case where Romney's campaign stated that if this person had the government sponsored healthcare "Romneycare", there would have been no death. When one puts it that way, it's makes it sound scary, like "if you don't use this government healthcare you will die!" No wonder he only served one term as governor of Massachusetts. Imagine if he was to become President, "Pay my taxes or you will die!!!"
I wonder if that is on YouTube. "YouTube, Liberal media of the 21st century!"
Hello canative62,
If you actually watched the YouTube video, you would see it is nothing more than playing clips of Romney on Fox News against CSPAN clips of his campaign.
Please try and actually know what you are talking about before leveling your opinion. It is starting to become a pater with you canative62 where you base your opinions off of imagination rather than reality.
Please try and actually watch the video before commenting on its content.
Score is now 34 to zero..
Crime, good video. Native lives in a bubble, it is hard to see from inside a bubble...
Which reminds me Native, when did I say your bible was evil?
This is your chance to show your etch-a-sketch skills..try a little harder than Willard, he sucks at that badly...
First it's "I have my own plan" then its "My plan is identical to his" then its "They are very different" then "My plan makes no changes at all, it stays the same".. Wow
And the score goes to 35 to zero...
Native, no comment on the Ryan/Romney Medicare Plan... You know the one Willard can't make up his mind on....
How about that bible quote? Got any proof yet?
You know what Barry sucks at badly? Holding the title of President of the United States..he sucks at that badly...that's why he will be gone in january.
Begs the question what political party would have a member politicize the death of a spouse for the sake of sensationalizing a campaingn ad for a chicago thug? Very shameful, but not surprising. Political desperation will make individuals of weak character say anything. Bye bye Barry!!!
Maybe you should take a look at how bad he "Sucks" and tell me which one of those things he did sucked?
http://whatthe****hasobamadonesofar.com/
Want me to list them for you?
Larry I clicked on the link but it come up a couldn't find,maybe you could resubmit it for us.
Sincerely,rozemist
Roze, the **** is a four letter word not appropriate for these pages... but you can go to the clean one:
whattheheckhasobamadonesofar.com
Lets review the basic..
Did obama bribe his owm party memembers to get the bill pass???
Did the Democrats who supported Obamacare run for re-election by taking credit for the bill?
Doers the bill actually do all it says????
Does not the bill hinder new jobs because companies are worried how the bill will affect new employees????
Does NOT adding healthcare reciepients to policies add to the costs???
Does NOT Obamcare require more health plan coverage by requiring no declining
pre conditions and adding dependant to the age of 26
Theress much more But The lefts responses seem to be short sighted and far from reality??
Again canative62, you have a MAJOR problem with reality!
1) NO
2) What are you talking about?
3) What? What Bill does not "do as it says?"
4) Maybe for people who can't run a business correctly.
5) NO it LOWERS the cost. Do you even know how insurance works?
6) YES, the ACA prevents people being declined for pre-existing conditions except Women for pregnancy. That will be enacted in 2014. It also allows dependents up to age 26 to be included on a family plan.
So of all your points, only the last was factually accurate and it was not even really a negative!
Again, are you even reading what you post?
Funny, Native tries to make something bad out of something good.
Who doesn't want insurance companies to cover them if they have pre-existing conditions? A Cancer patient, someone with a heart condition, what?
And what parent isn't thrilled to death that they can insure their college student children up to age 26 are covered under their own plan?
I happen to fill all those conditions and I am sure as hell glad they exist.
I guess all the libs expect those EVIL rich companies to EAT the extra costs...
What naive people do not understand is that what was promised, was that COSTS would not go UP, yet increase costs get pushed on the providers..
One could wonder if it is just not a subtle way of Obama trying to keep his promise to the AFofL CIO to get single payer health care???BY destroying the income of private health care providers.???
Those damn Libs!
That's why I am voting for Libertarian Presidential candidate Gary Johnson, because of those damn Libs, and those thieving, lying Conservatives!
No more lesser of the two evils for me!
Www.garyjohnson2012.com finally, we have a choice!
Native, do you have proof of a "promise" made to the AFofL CIO?
Do you also have proof of my saying your Bible is EVIL?
You don't have a true choice. What you have is a spoiler. There is a big difference between a choice and a spoiler. You know that you religiously offensive bully.
You are the ultimate online BULLY Maestro here, Hoffman. But your Hoffocrisy is so blatantly insulting and cheap. I see you still favor your old friend Sov the religiously offensive type.
What an ironic post. I think one could look at the posts here and easily make up their own mind as to who is a bully and who posts items of substance.
Regardless, it goog to see how LarryBacca here used a Creative Commons (CC) licensed picture in his blog in contrast to the similar blog here that not only uses a copyright protected picture, but, the author also photoshoped out the original authors signature as well as the copyright notice. Both of which are not only unethical, but also very illegal.
Here is the ORIGINAL item (notice the signature in the bottom right): http://i811.photobucket.com/albums/zz...
Here is the one as posted on the Bulletin Blog site (notice the signature is removed): http://media.morristechnology.com/med...
And that is just the picture! The actual content is more or less grasping at straws or just quoting opinions the author of the list does not agree with politically. The "list" of 44 items on that post boils down to more or less TWO(2) actual gripes.
Great job Larry of not only playing within to confines of FACTS and REALITY, but, for also not stealing other peoples works as well. I tis a shame that some people need to steel from others to pad their ego.
Crimeriddendump, it's good to see, as the childish one points out, that you have friends. You can see by the jealousy in his post that he is lacking this honor, but it's not hard to see why.
Hello Larry, I think it is rather interesting that not one conservative poster on this site has tried to challenge the veracity or context of the actual quote that you listed. I wonder why that is? Sincerely, Karen
Hi KarenPearsall,
In the act of fairness and to teach a lesson for the others in objectivity, I will:
1) Valid
2) Pretty valid as it shows how he is out of touch with the average American
3) More of a slip of the tongue
4) Valid
5) A great example of Mitt Romney contradicting himself
6) Meh ...
7) I don't know the context of this quote
8) Valid
9) It was his opinion. Might be more valid/interesting if contrasted with a more recent con flicting quote.
10) His opinion. Again, might be more valid/interesting if contrasted with a more recent con flicting quote.
11) Valid
12) I'll say valid
13) Valid. Very, very valid.
14) More of misspeaking than anything else
15) Valid
16) Valid
17) Valid
18) Valid
19) Valid
20) Meh, maybe just a bad joke
21) Valid
22) Valid
23) Just an opinion
24) Valid
25) Valid
26) Valid
27) Misspeaking
28) Valid, I guess it was OK before ...
29) Valid
30) A bad joke
31) Valid
32) Valid
33) Valid
34) Misspeaking
35) Valid
Of the 35 listed, I could go out on a limb and refute 11 of them.
Karen, I see someone put out a list of alleged Obama gaffs with most of them being refuted. I don't know why our right wing fringe folks didn't try to refute my list and it took a Liberal to do it for them which I more or less agree with. So even with 11 being refuted, the number refuted from the other list is much greater.
I would subtract all those from YouTube, it's too easy to edit and submit to YouTube. There is even a YouTube video where Obama is allegedly admitting he was born in Kenya so you can see why I would be skeptical of YouTube as a valid source.
Anyway, it looks like my list has about 24 valid vetted entries. The other list has something like 8.
But like Karen has suggested, your right wing fringe guys can take a shot at my list anytime now that Crimeriddendump has shown you how to go about it.
I posted this in Bulls piece, just in case Native and Fredo missed it:
Bull, Crimeriddendump is completely right in that what you posted is not a "gaff" but is just position on your part. He is also correct about your dismissing the arguments against items on your "list". If you are just trying to run up a score, regardless of it's validity, then you are doing nothing but take away from any credibility you may have had.
So you should actually start with a score of two, I in turn will be willing to take eight away that Crimeriddendumb pointed out. Plus I will be willing to address any others you may want to challenge. Native and Fredo can jump in any time as well...
Oops....looks like #37 got put in twice. I know Bull quit and took his ball home on this but I think I'll just keep adding to this list or maybe I'll start another one.
How about a list of Romney contradictions, there certainly are lots of them. :-)
Larry,
Are you waiting too? It seems these two clowns like to cast aspersions, and then hide when you call them out. Very representative to their political leanings. They make highly erroneous statements and then run and hide. And to think they want people to buy into the BS that they are slinging.
It causes one to thing how dumb they think people are to be so easily manipulated by simpletons as they try on us.
Do you guys just make this stuff up?
Ok friendo and canative, put up, or at least admit to all that read these blogs that you are simply playing them for a fool.
The REAL people who read this bnlog already know how you simpletons believe the Conseervatives and Christians don't deserve a voice.....
What they might not understand is that it is the same line of thinking of the current adm,inistration......
4 more years of Obama COULD limit "denomination specific" talk to the church building
Could bring about the "fairness doctrine " which is intended to silence voices of oposition INCLUDING those of third parties......
Will bring higher unemployment due to higher taxes, (disposable incomes shrink) more restrisctions on businesses,
Higher gas prices but limiting US oil production, Which bring higher consumer prices and don't forget the ACA which will cut into jobs raise prices and dramatically cut the medical profession..... you know the number of doctors available to help...
PROVE ME WRONG actually deal with issues
Native, you don't want to clear your name? Just tell us where we said what you claim we said.
Where did I say your Bible was EVIL?
Native, unless you are a liar, you should be able to pull up these quotes that you claim Larry and I made.
Its as easy as this:
canative62 commented on Wednesday, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:19 PM
BUT IAM a LIAR
Odd in that it took a labeled Lefty to get the ball rolling and even more odd that the RW Boys said nada... but then maybe not so odd as expected...
Meanwhile Native sleeps quietly in his bubble...
Seriously, I am confused. I comment on the non validity of both these comment here in LarryBacca's list and on Bull153's list. LarryBacca is gracious for the change of debate and discussion and Bull153 acts like I have insulted him in some grave unspeakable way for simply questing the motivation behind several of his quotes.
It really illustrates here the difference between mature poster who want to broaden their understandings of the world, and immature political tool that want nothing more than to hear themselves talk and proclaim themselves to be correct despite reality.
Sad and pathetic is what it is, not to mention freakishly immature.
Hi LarryBacca,
When there is nothing for some of the Bulletin posters to copy-and-paste from, they are conveniently silent.
I was just going to say the same thing when you said "..want nothing more than to hear themselves talk.." which in Natives case, really isn't him talking at all, but someone else that he just copies from...
As, for Bull153, well he lives in that same bubble doesn't he?